Human and television
Humans tv show
The longer I watched, the worse I'd feel. The process is called photosynthesis. The heartbeat slows to idle, the pulse rate tends to even out, the brainwave patterns go into a smooth and steady rhythm. While I make no claims about this amounting to any kind of bona fide scientific sampling, the phrases people chose had a definite consistency. Undoubtedly, television has millions of viewers in the world and thanks to its inventor Philo Farnsworth, a Utah-born genius that had coloured the world of modern technology. I asked him what, if anything, had been done on television light. He suggests that light playing against the skin is itself stimulating. This is true even for the eyes, which are widely presumed to be active during television viewing. If red, blue and green phosphorescent light is being projected at 25, volts directly into human eyes and from there to the endocrine system, and if humans are receiving light in that way for four hours a day on the average, while depriving themselves of natural light, what can be said about the possible effects of this? Incandescent light, for example, emphasizes the portion of the spectrum near the infrared while minimizing or leaving out others. So whatever stimulation is felt is instantly repressed. Therefore, whatever light-receptive capacities exist in humans, and whatever cellular reactions humans have to light, they must have evolved to be attuned to the particular spectra emitted by those light sources.
She told me that Chinese healing systems coordinate treatments of various organs with foods of specific color. If red, blue and green phosphorescent light is being projected at 25, volts directly into human eyes and from there to the endocrine system, and if humans are receiving light in that way for four hours a day on the average, while depriving themselves of natural light, what can be said about the possible effects of this?
Humans series 4
Wurtman on how artificial light is curing all kinds of diseases. Now in his seventies, Ott presides over a board of directors of doctors and medical researchers who do pioneering work on the effects of light on the human body. He argues that the body cannot handle this intervention in a natural human relationship with the environment any more than it can handle food additives or chemicals in the air. In one celebrated series of studies, the roots of bean plants he placed in front of color television sets grew upward out of the soil. Too many of them walking in step sets up a wavelength pattern which has been known to resonate with that of the materials of the bridge and the whole thing can collapse. I'm sure that one way or the other your diet of both food and light is responsible for a lot of different physical reactions that we haven't been able to measure yet. Television is here to stay.
While reading, you vary the speed at which you read, go over material and raise your eyes off the page from time to time. But while you are watching television, no matter what is happening on the screen, however far away the action of the story is supposed to be inside the set, the set itself remains at a fixed distance and requires only an infinitesimal change in focus.
Those kept under other light sources had an average life span double that of the first group.
If light is also food, then might we not seek it, as plants do? It rings bells and rings true. These are not metaphors.
Fourth, tune in tomorrow. I asked Ott if he had studied the effects of the particular spectral emanations of color television: the red, blue and green phosphors.
based on 42 review