They know the Law of Nature; they break it.
And yet it is not a fact in the ordinary sense, in the same way as our actual behavior is a fact. We cannot do without it, and we cannot do with it. Some people talk as if meeting the gaze of absolute goodness would be fun. First, that human beings, all over the earth, have this curious idea that they ought to behave in a certain way, and cannot really get rid of it.
Liked it? Then nurture is how we are impacted by our environment; these are, parents, siblings, family, peers, culture, gender, norms, child rearing, and experiences My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust.
They offer an explanation of how God can be this impersonal mind at the back of the Moral Law and yet also a Person.I believe that Lewis is right when he talks about there being a moral code. Liked it? Secondly, that they do not in fact behave that way. However, both sides of the debate need to come to their sense because the human being is a product of nature and nurture. And yet it is not a fact in the ordinary sense, in the same way as our actual behavior is a fact. What exactly is it that stimulates our responses to certain situations and problems. The essay gets more thought provoking as it goes on. The law mandated that all slaves that escaped from the South had to be returned to their rightful owner. A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line…Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. The natural law is established by God in order to make men more virtuous. It was a philosophical and logical discussion.